In many European jurisdictions, the top marginal personal income tax rates for people with high incomes consistently exceed 45%. For instance, in Denmark the “ceiling” reaches 60.5%, while in Ireland and Greece a substantial portion of large earnings often falls into brackets of over 40%.
At the same time, countries with relatively high standard rates often offer targeted preferential regimes that reduce the tax burden on foreign-sourced income. The mechanics vary: some regimes limit taxation on certain categories of receipts, others introduce a fixed annual payment, and some use a deemed remittance style approach—where tax arises only when funds are actually brought into the country. These schemes are typically designed for highly mobile profiles: investors, entrepreneurs, retirees, and specialists willing to change their tax residency.
When building this ranking, we deliberately excluded jurisdictions where a low rate effectively applies “to everyone” regardless of status (for example, Hungary with a flat 15%, Bulgaria at 10%, and also microstates). Below are seven European jurisdictions with high baseline taxes, but with tailored regimes for “new residents.”
Spain deserves a separate note. The Beckham Law program can theoretically deliver around 24% on employment income and additional relief on certain types of passive foreign income. However, in practice the regime is quite narrow: you must move to Spain specifically to work, it applies for 6 years, and there are also risks of increased scrutiny from the tax authorities if your business activity becomes more substantial. For these reasons, Spain is not included in the overall ranking.
The underlying logic differs from country to country: in some places there is remittance basis taxation (tax is linked to bringing income into the country), in others there is a fixed annual contribution regardless of the size of receipts, and sometimes there is a combination of income-category rates and exemptions.
Positions in the ranking were determined using five factors:
No single criterion is universally dominant. Even if a regime has a formally low rate, the overall outcome can worsen if residency conditions are too strict and the benefit period is limited.
Switzerland is not a “low-tax” jurisdiction. In several cantons, top levels of taxation exceed 40% (including, for example, Geneva, Vaud, and Basel-Stadt). In practice, the combined tax burden on high incomes at the federal, cantonal, and municipal levels can be comparable to France and Germany.
At the same time, there is a forfait fiscal regime aimed at foreigners who are Swiss tax residents but do not carry on paid activity in Switzerland. Instead of calculating tax based on actual income, the basis is linked to a spending level: it is determined as the highest value among several benchmarks (e.g., 7 times annual rent, 3 times hotel living expenses, or a federal minimum).
Typically, the annual payment starts around CHF 250,000 and, depending on the canton, can exceed CHF 1 million. With very large foreign inflows, the effective rate can sometimes become “single-digit,” but the entry threshold remains among the highest in this ranking.
There is no default time limit: the benefits extend to family members as long as requirements are met. The program is one of the oldest in its category and has historically attracted HNWI/ULTRA-HNWI investors for whom political stability, banking infrastructure, and personal security matter.
Why Switzerland is not higher in the ranking:
Poland is a relatively “quiet” option, conceptually similar to a set of well-known regimes such as Beckham Law. The scheme is intended for high earners who move their tax residency to Poland.
The annual fixed payment is 200,000 PLN (approximately €47,000 at current exchange rates). In most cases, foreign income is exempt from Polish taxation, although exceptions remain—especially those linked to controlled foreign companies (CFC) rules. For spouses and dependants, there is an “add-on” for an extra 100,000 PLN per person per year. In addition, participation requires an annual mandatory spending of 100,000 PLN on projects of public significance (science, education, cultural heritage, sport, etc.).
To qualify, you must obtain a tax residency certificate from a country other than Poland confirming that you had the status in at least 5 out of the prior 6 years, after which you effectively establish tax residency in Poland.
The standard model for Polish residents taxes worldwide income under a progressive scale of 12% and 32%, plus a 4% solidarity levy on income above 1 million PLN. Therefore, the fixed contribution is often rational when foreign inflows are in the “seven-figure” range.
Poland’s weaknesses in the ranking:
Italy’s regime dei nuovi residenti was long considered one of Europe’s strongest “flat-tax” solutions. When launched in 2017, the fixed payment was €100,000. In 2024, the threshold increased to €200,000, and starting January 1, 2026 for new applicants—after budget amendments—it is set at €300,000. The family add-on also rose: from €25,000 to €50,000 per family member.
With genuinely large foreign income, the math can remain favorable. For example, with €2 million of foreign income per year, the effective rate is often around 15–20%, while Italy’s standard top bracket is 43% (including regional and municipal add-ons).
The regime also provides partial relief from certain Italian obligations related to foreign assets: taxes and reporting for foreign assets, as well as inheritance and gift taxes as they apply to offshore structures.
Conditions:
Separately: Italy also has other special regimes—for instance, a 7% pension tax for moving to certain specific southern municipalities (up to 10 years), and Lavoratori Impatriati with a 50% exemption on employment income for returning specialists.
Why Italy ranks lower: raising the threshold to €300,000 makes the program economically attractive mainly for extremely wealthy families (often with foreign income above €1 million per year). For a broader segment of mobile individuals, it is less compelling than regimes designed for HNWI/ULTRA-HNWI profiles.
Greece offers two different non-dom scenarios, aimed at different taxpayer profiles.
1) Non-Dom for investors. The requirement is a minimum of €500,000 invested in Greek assets (real estate, business, securities, or stakes in Greek companies). Investments may be allocated across several categories (up to three) and must be completed within three years after the application. In return, an annual payment of €100,000 applies to all foreign income for up to 15 years, regardless of the amount received.
The family may be included as well (for example, €20,000 per adult per year). For included family members, there are inheritance and gift tax benefits regarding foreign assets. Income earned within Greece is taxed under standard progressive rates (up to 44%). There is also a condition that you are not a Greek tax resident for 7 out of 8 prior years.
2) Non-Dom for retirees. A 7% rate applies to foreign pension and other passive income (dividends, interest, annuities), as well as to capital gains arising from abroad—also for up to 15 years. The conditions are not being a Greek tax resident for 5 out of 6 previous years and relocating from a country with which Greece has an active double tax treaty or administrative cooperation agreement.
If withholding tax was paid at source in another jurisdiction, it may be credited against the pension regime amount (but not against the investor’s fixed payment).
Why Greece ranks high:
Why not higher: the investor scenario requires a significant investment threshold, while the retiree scenario may require separate qualification to include family members.
Ireland’s non-dom regime is often described as one of the most “transparent” implementations of an approach that has been used in the UK for more than two centuries—until the UK abolished the model in April 2025.
If you are an Irish tax resident but do not have domicile in Ireland, Irish tax is charged only on income arising in Ireland and on foreign receipts that you actually remit to the country. As a rule, foreign profits and income left outside Ireland are not subject to Irish tax.
Key features of Ireland:
The trade-off is clear: income arising in Ireland is taxed at high rates. Capital gains are taxed at 33%, and the basic income tax rates can reach up to 40%, with USC and PRSI applying as well. Therefore, remittance basis delivers meaningful benefit mainly when your strategy is to keep foreign capital and profits outside Ireland.
Also: the Immigrant Investor Programme for non-residents (non-EU) has been closed to new applications since 2023. At the same time, EU/EEA and UK citizens can relocate and use the non-dom regime immediately.
Malta’s non-dom regime based on remittance is considered one of the most flexible in Europe. Tax applies only to Maltese-source income and to foreign receipts that you remit to Malta. In general, foreign income and capital gains left abroad are taxed at 0%.
The minimum annual tax is €5,000, but it applies only if foreign income exceeds €35,000. For lower amounts, the minimum payment may not be required.
Advantages of Malta:
Another plus: foreign capital gains are generally exempt from Maltese tax regardless of domicile status—even if they are remitted to Malta. However, capital gains from the sale of Maltese real estate remain taxable.
For non-residents from non-EU countries, there are separate residency routes, including the Permanent Residence Programme (conditions depend on the format and may involve administrative payments and real-estate/contribution requirements). There is also the Global Residence Programme with a fixed tax rate on foreign income remitted to Malta.
Malta’s limitations are mostly practical: limited territory, rising property prices, and constrained healthcare infrastructure. But if your goal is tax efficiency specifically for foreign income, the combination of “low entry cost + no time limit + 0% on foreign capital gains” is hard to match among other European options.
Cyprus’s non-dom regime is often considered the most advantageous special mechanism for mobile investors whose income is generated mainly through dividends and interest. The reason is the development of an approach that became popular after similar solutions were abandoned in the UK.
The essence of the benefit is as follows: non-domiciled residents (non-doms) who are tax residents of Cyprus pay 0% Special Defence Contribution (SDC) on dividends and interest regardless of where those incomes are sourced. For domiciled residents, the SDC rate on dividends is 5% (after the 2025 changes), while for non-doms it is 0%.
Capital gains from the sale of securities in Cyprus are fully exempt regardless of domicile status. Starting January 1, 2026, the rental rules were also updated: SDC on rental income no longer applies to Cyprus tax residents—it is included in standard income taxation.
The SDC benefit lasts 17 years from the date the status is obtained. After the 2026 reform, the possibility to extend was introduced: non-doms may extend the benefit for up to two additional 5-year periods by paying a fixed fee of €250,000 for each period. In theory, the window of benefits can therefore reach 27 years if extensions are pursued.
Cyprus residency requirements are checked fairly flexibly: the 60-day rule applies. You can become a tax resident by spending 60 days in Cyprus during the year. At the same time, you must not be in any other single country for 183+ days, keep permanent housing in Cyprus (rented or owned), and carry on activities/work in Cyprus or hold a position in a Cyprus resident company.
From 2026, personal income tax rates are revised: there will be a tax-free threshold of €22,000 and a top rate of 35% on income above €72,001. For highly paid employees, a 50% exemption on salary income above €55,000 is available for up to 17 years.
For investors from non-EU countries, there is a separate logic for permanent establishment through real-estate investment (for example, a benchmark of €300,000). In terms of citizenship, for EU practice the usual target is obtaining status after seven years of continuous physical presence.
Why Cyprus takes first place: the combination of 0% SDC on dividends, capital gains exemption on securities, and relatively soft residency conditions (60 days) creates an effective tax burden that is difficult to compare with other major European jurisdictions in the same price segment.
If you’re looking at Europe not only as a place to live, but also as an investment platform with potentially better tax outcomes under qualifying residency, consider how different jurisdictions structure targeted regimes for investors and non-residents. At Digital Nomad we help you assess what’s most practical for your profile—from capital requirements to residency status and tax implications. Explore options here: https://digital-nomad.gr/en/goldenvisa
Our Telegram channel about various types of Greek residence permits, digital nomad programs, and the Greek Golden Visa: @digitalnomadgr